Buzz words
I was in a meeting yesterday with someone from the New Technology Foundation, and a Deputy Superintendent from a school district in central Texas. There were many things that grabbed my attention. The first was the density of buzz words in the conversation. I must have heard the words: PBL, technology, reform, high stakes, standards, and higher order thinking skills, to name a few, about about two dozen times each in less than 2 hours. In the culture of education we seem to be gravitated to buzz words. We implement programs and spend vast amounts of money on projects because they can be described with these words. It's important to look past the terms when making decisions in education and realize that the words you can use to describe a policy decision, program, or project really have no significance. What matters is what is actually happening day to day with students.
Data and Statistics
I am getting really sick of educators spending so much time and effort on data analysis, particularly when they when they try to apply results to every single school, every single class, and every single student. The best example of this by far is standardized tests. Why are we so obsessed with test scores at the state and national level? Is it because we feel we need to hold schools accountable for the money we give them? That is sad. Is it because we think standardized test are an indicator of how much a student is learning, or how successful they will be after high school? How can a multiple choice test designed by an institution independent from schools and given to every different kind of student across a state or across a nation measure that effectively? It can't. If we feel the need to assess students on a state or national level, we could at least come up with a better indicator or measure of success than a test score. What about the number of students that finish some sort of post-secondary education after college? I think this is one thing we are really after, not a high test score.
School Reform Models
I am all for projects like the New Tech High School and other campus reform models in K12 education, but I am very hesitant about trying to replicate a model across the country and labeling it as "the model that works". There isn't a holy grail of school models or even classroom models. Every school district, every school campus, and every school classroom is different. There too many variables to name. They include socio-economic status, cultural diversity, regional issues, and political issues. I worry that people see school reform models as a silver bullet. They find one they like (or get funded for) and implement it with foolish accuracy to the model. The best things to come from reform models are ideas. When making changes in education, don't replicate what has been done. Take pieces of many different models you think will work in your district, campus, or class and fit them together like a puzzle for your students. And remember, each year student populations change. What you do one year might not work the next.
technorati tags:technology, policy, PBL, buzzwords, standards, reform, high-stakes, data, schools, k12, educaton, models
Blogged with Flock